Workout Lab
comparison features guide

Best Workout Tracker App Comparison: Strong, Hevy, Fitbod, JEFIT, Setgraph, and Workout Lab

Workout Lab Team · · 10 min de lectura

The best workout tracker app is the one that accurately captures what you actually do. For athletes who train standard barbell lifts at a commercial gym, almost any app works. For athletes who train calisthenics, yoga, strongman, running, or any combination of sports, the field narrows quickly.

This best workout tracker app comparison covers Strong, Hevy, Fitbod, JEFIT, and Setgraph alongside Workout Lab, across criteria that matter: metric flexibility, analytics depth, goal tracking, sport versatility, and usability. The goal is an honest assessment, not a sales pitch.

Pricing and feature sets change; treat specific figures here as accurate at time of writing and verify before subscribing.

What the Best Workout Tracking Apps Need to Handle

Most workout apps were built for one use case: load and reps in a gym. That model covers the majority of athletes. It fails to cover:

  • Calisthenics hold times (tuck planche for 12 seconds)
  • Flexibility metrics (pike stretch 8cm from floor)
  • Band-assisted training (pull-ups at -15kg assistance, tracking toward 0kg)
  • Carries and events (farmer’s walk: 80kg for 40m)
  • Hybrid sessions where a single workout includes a barbell lift, a skill hold, and a loaded stretch

How each app handles these edge cases separates generalist tools from specialist ones.

Pricing at a Glance

AppFree TierMonthlyAnnual
Strong3 routines$4.99/mo$29.99/yr
HevyUnlimited logs, limited analytics$4.99/mo$39.99/yr
Fitbod3 workouts trial$15.99/mo$79.99/yr
JEFITYes (ad-supported)$12.99/mo$69.99/yr
SetgraphLimited$4.99/mo
Workout LabYes (10 exercises)€3.99/mo€24.99/yr

Pricing changes; verify before subscribing. Workout Lab prices shown in EUR and may vary by region.

Strong

Strong has been around since 2012 and has a loyal following, particularly among powerlifters and bodybuilders. Its reputation is deserved: the interface is clean, logging a set takes 2-3 taps, and the warmup calculator is genuinely useful.

Where Strong excels: speed of logging for standard lifts. If you’re running a 5/3/1 program or a standard PPL split with barbell and dumbbell work, Strong handles the workflow efficiently. The exercise library covers standard movements well, and the 1RM calculator gives you estimated maxes from your rep performance. Data export (CSV) makes it easy to migrate elsewhere or analyze in a spreadsheet.

Where Strong falls short: metric flexibility. Strong’s set structure is fundamentally load/reps/time. There’s no native ROM tracking, no custom metric combinations, and limited analytics beyond basic volume and 1RM trend charts. The weekly reporting is minimal compared to what dedicated analytics-focused apps offer.

Pricing: $4.99/month or $29.99/year (Strong PRO), with a one-time lifetime option. The free tier caps you at three custom routines, which is limiting for athletes running periodized programs with multiple training blocks.

Best for: Powerlifters, bodybuilders, anyone running standard barbell programs who wants a fast, polished logging experience.

Hevy

Hevy positions itself similarly to Strong but with an emphasis on social features: sharing workouts, following friends, and public exercise templates contributed by the community. The free tier is more generous than Strong’s — unlimited workout logging with no routine cap — making Hevy accessible without a subscription commitment.

The interface is clean and the logging flow is straightforward. Exercise history is visible during workouts, which helps with progressive overload decisions. The social layer is a genuine differentiator for athletes who train alongside friends or want community accountability built into the app.

Hevy’s analytics are comparable to Strong’s: functional but not deep. You can see volume trends and exercise history, but there’s no weekly report structure, no muscle group analysis, and no custom metric support beyond the standard load/reps framework.

Pricing: $4.99/month or $39.99/year for Hevy Pro. The free tier covers core logging well enough for athletes who don’t need advanced analytics.

Best for: Athletes who want a free, social-enabled tracker for standard gym training.

Fitbod

Fitbod takes a fundamentally different approach. Rather than logging what you planned to do, Fitbod generates workouts for you based on your equipment, available time, and muscle fatigue recovery model. The algorithm estimates how recovered each muscle group is from previous sessions and programs accordingly.

This is genuinely useful for beginners who don’t know how to program their own training, and for intermediate athletes who want to offload programming decisions. The muscle fatigue model is reasonably accurate for hypertrophy-focused training, and the workout variety it generates prevents the stagnation that comes from repeating the same routine indefinitely.

The trade-off: you’re following Fitbod’s program, not your own. If you train a specific system — a periodized powerlifting block, a calisthenics progression toward a specific skill, or a 12-week split cycle — Fitbod is the wrong tool. You can log custom workouts, but the app’s value proposition depends on using its programming.

Sport versatility is also limited. Fitbod’s model is built around gym equipment and muscle-group-based training. Tracking a calisthenics skill hold, a flexibility session, or a strongman event doesn’t fit the algorithm’s framework.

Pricing: $15.99/month or $79.99/year — the most expensive option in this comparison by a significant margin. The cost is justified if you actively use the workout generation feature; less so if you’re just logging sessions you designed yourself.

Best for: Beginners and intermediate gym-goers who want intelligent workout generation and don’t follow a specific program.

JEFIT

JEFIT has one of the largest exercise libraries available, with over 1,400 exercises, illustrations, and instructions. Its workout scheduling and planning features are more developed than most competitors, allowing for multi-week program templates with planned progressions built in advance.

The interface is functional but dated compared to Strong or Hevy, and the mobile app has historically had more friction in the logging flow. Analytics are present but basic — you can see training volume and exercise history, but the reporting doesn’t approach what dedicated analytics-focused apps provide.

For athletes who prioritize program planning (building out a 16-week periodization and managing the weekly schedule), JEFIT covers more of that workflow than alternatives. For data analysis and weekly reporting, it’s limited.

Pricing: $12.99/month or $69.99/year for JEFIT Elite. The free tier is functional but ad-supported.

Best for: Athletes who want extensive exercise libraries and multi-week program planning.

Setgraph

Setgraph is a data-focused tracker built around analytics for standard barbell and dumbbell training. Its distinguishing feature is advanced exercise data filtering: you can view your progress for specific rep ranges, filter sessions by weight class, and compare training blocks in graphical form. The 1RM estimation and volume trend visualizations are more granular than what Strong or Hevy provide.

The scope is narrower than its competitors: metric flexibility stays within standard load/reps, there’s no custom metric support, and the social layer is absent. Setgraph recently added AI-generated workout plans, though the core product is the logging and analytics experience for conventional gym training.

Pricing: Free tier with limited history; $4.99/month for Pro with full analytics access.

Best for: Intermediate gym-goers who want stronger data visualization for standard lifts but don’t need custom metrics or social features.

Workout Lab

Workout Lab’s core design decision separates it from all four competitors: every exercise can be configured with any combination of metrics rather than defaulting to load and reps.

The available metrics are:

  • Load (with optional bodyweight addition).
  • Reps.
  • RPE (rate of perceived exertion).
  • Time.
  • Distance.
  • ROM (centimeters).

When you create or select an exercise, you choose which metrics apply to it. A squat tracks load, reps, and RPE. A front lever tracks time and bodyweight. A Jefferson curl tracks reps, load and ROM. A farmer’s walk tracks load, distance, and time.

This flexibility means Workout Lab is the only app in this comparison that accurately tracks calisthenics skill work, flexibility training measured in centimeters, band-assisted progressions (logged as negative load, tracking from -15kg toward 0kg), and any combination of sport-specific metrics in a single session.

Analytics depth is where Workout Lab diverges most sharply from the field.

  • Weekly reports cover:
    • Total volume, duration, and session count.
    • Hypertrophy analysis (volume per muscle group against research-based targets).
    • Strength analysis (load and frequency adequacy).
    • Goal progress (which targets moved forward this week).
  • Exercise Analysis shows:
    • Your estimated 1RM trend for any exercise over any time range.
    • Volume distribution.
    • RPE trends that indicate recovery issues before they become injuries.

When RPE for a fixed working weight trends upward across consecutive sessions, Exercise Analysis flags it directly. An 80kg squat at RPE 7 in week 1 and RPE 9 in week 5 is a recovery signal, not a strength signal. Catching it early is the difference between a timely deload and a missed training block.

Goal tracking in Workout Lab is designed around delta improvement: you set a target value for any tracked metric, and the app shows your progress toward it each week. A calisthenics athlete tracking toward a 15-second tuck planche hold, a powerlifter tracking toward a 180kg deadlift estimated 1RM, and a flexibility athlete tracking toward 0cm splits gap all use the same framework. For guidance on structuring training targets that drive accountability, see how to set SMART fitness goals.

Where Workout Lab is honest about its current limitations: the exercise library is growing but not yet as large as JEFIT’s. The social features that Hevy offers aren’t present. The app is newer and the user base is smaller, which means fewer community-contributed exercises. Nonetheless the possibility of creating your own exercises makes up for this. See how to build and use a custom exercise library for practical guidance on getting the most from this capability.

For athletes who train within the standard load/reps paradigm and want fast, polished logging, Strong or Hevy are excellent choices. For athletes whose training extends beyond that, or who want serious analytics and weekly data reports rather than basic history charts, Workout Lab is the tool built for the job.

Best for: Athletes who track non-standard metrics (holds, ROM, distance, RPE), train multiple disciplines, follow their own programming, and want deep weekly analytics.

What Happens to Your Data If You Switch?

Before committing to any tracker, consider what happens to months or years of logged workouts if you change apps. Training history is genuinely valuable — trend data from 50+ sessions tells you things that 5 sessions can’t — so portability matters.

Strong, Hevy, and JEFIT all support workout export in CSV format, readable by spreadsheet software and importable into other platforms. Fitbod offers export options as well. For athletes accumulating data over months and years, the ability to migrate without starting from zero is a practical consideration worth checking before subscribing.

A related question: does the app display your history in ways that help you make decisions, or does it just store it? Storage without analysis produces an archive, not a feedback loop. The difference between seeing “I logged 200 sessions this year” and “here’s which weeks your volume dropped and how that correlated with your progress plateau” is what separates trackers that inform training from ones that merely record it.

Side-by-Side Summary

FeatureStrongHevyFitbodJEFITSetgraphWorkout Lab
Load/RepsYesYesYesYesYesYes
Time trackingLimitedNoNoLimitedNoYes
ROM (cm)NoNoNoNoNoYes
Negative load (bands)NoNoNoNoNoYes
RPE trackingYesLimitedNoLimitedNoYes
Weekly reportsBasicBasicBasicBasicBasicComprehensive
Muscle group analysisNoNoYesLimitedNoYes
Goal tracking w/ deltaNoNoNoNoNoYes
AI workout generationNoNoYesNoYesNo
Social sharingLimitedYesNoYesNoNo
Data exportCSVCSVYesCSVLimitedYes
Free tier3 routinesYesTrialYes (ads)LimitedYes (10 exercises)
Monthly price$4.99$4.99$15.99$12.99$4.99€3.99

How to Choose the Best Workout Tracker App

If your training is standard gym-based lifts and you want the fastest logging experience available, Strong is the most polished option.

If you want a free app with social features and your training fits the load/reps model, Hevy is a strong choice. The unlimited free tier makes it low-risk to try.

If you don’t know how to program your own training and want the app to handle programming decisions, Fitbod is worth trying, especially for the first year — keeping in mind it’s also the most expensive option and its value is tied to actively using its recommendations.

If program planning and exercise library depth are your priorities, JEFIT covers more of that workflow.

If you want stronger analytics for standard gym training and don’t need custom metrics or social features, Setgraph is worth evaluating alongside Strong and Hevy.

If your training includes any metrics beyond load and reps, or if you want analytics that actually explain what your data means rather than just displaying it, Workout Lab is the app built for that use case. See what tracking any sport looks like in practice, and why the data you collect matters before you choose a tool.

Download Workout Lab to see how metric flexibility and weekly reporting change how you interact with your training data.

Empieza a registrar tu progreso

Convierte tus datos de entrenamiento en información útil con Workout Lab.

Empieza gratis